You Can Truly Care For All Things: Chapter 13 of the Tao Te Ching

Accept disgrace willingly.
Accept misfortune as the human condition.

What do you mean by “Accept disgrace willingly”?
Accept being unimportant.
Do not be concerned with loss or gain.
This is called “accepting disgrace willingly.”

What do you mean by “Accept misfortune as the human condition”?
Misfortune comes from having a body.
Without a body, how could there be misfortune?

Surrender yourself humbly; then you can be trusted to care for all things.
Love the world as your own self; then you can truly care for all things.

Tao Te Ching, Chapter 13. Translated Gia-Fu Feng 1972

Just reading it over from top to bottom once already gives you the second layer. Imagining the unsure student, he interjects, twice, “what do you mean by that,” and then clarifies himself. His clarifications are as blunt as the initial statements. I will go through each line in detail, but the device used here, which is the making of an impossible demand and reinforcing it without admission of hyperbole, is something to note right away: he means what he says!

Accept disgrace willingly. What exactly is meant by “disgrace?” It is initially distinguished from “misfortune.” He clarifies disgrace by speaking of one’s relative position in a social hierarchy, and clarifies misfortune as a natural consequence of having a body – an inevitability like sickness, old age and death.

There is so much in these words to wrestle with, and I think it is obvious that Lao Tzu fully expects us to do so. If you eagerly nod along, agreeing readily – yes, yes, kill the ego! – you may not have understood the assignment. Disgrace is painful. Being minimized, put in one’s place, and suffering the vicissitudes of fortune – nothing is easy about any of this. I love that he invites us to entertain the hope that his true meaning isn’t as stark as it initially seems by dangling “what do you mean by ‘accept disgrace willingly’?”, and that he immediately follows it with “accept being unimportant.” And then another hammering: “do not be concerned with loss or gain.” And then something like a final harumph or bah humbug: “this is called ‘accepting disgrace willingly.” This is a real dressing down. Nothing held back. Your expectations for yourself are to be entirely reevaluated and tempered, and there is no wiggle room about it. Of course, there is good news, but it comes later, and we are not there yet!

Accept being unimportant. I don’t know about you, but I very much want to matter. It feels good to go to work and feel like I belong there, that I’m respected, that people are happy to see me, and that what I’m about to spend the next several hours doing has some relevance to both my colleagues and customers. I also expect to be fairly and systematically compensated for every moment I spend working and for every output I generate. I want to matter to my friends and family too, and even more so. I think I can endure a lot of what I contend with at work because I matter to the people at home.

And then Lao Tzu commands me to accept being unimportant and to be unconcerned with loss or gain. Some part of me is already offended. Don’t you know I’ve got to make it? That I’ve got to increase my productive capacity, earn more, save more, invest more, and climb higher and higher year after year until I can fulfill every expectation I have of myself that others surely have of me too? Don’t I have to crack the code and become the maximally successful version of myself, or else I’ve squandered my life?

Accept being unimportant. Do not be concerned with loss or gain. He doesn’t say “don’t work so hard” or “don’t do your best” or anything like that. I think what these frigid words are really meant to do is prepare me for the inevitable feeling that no matter what I do there will be ups and downs. Gains, yes, but losses of many different kinds. I might earn some level of esteem in a profession, in a community, and within my own family, but I am never going to be another’s highest priority. People are self interested the way I am self interested. Ironically, if I take myself seriously and this is an intrinsic aspect of myself, it guarantees that this will to importance will always be met with frustration: every person from whom I want respect and acknowledgement is somehow busy with something important to himself or herself the moment I need to feel important. And to make matters worse, it doesn’t really help when it’s offered freely: it needs to be there when I come looking for it.

Lao Tzu would recommend that I do not come looking for it at all. To not think much of it when it is displayed, and even less when it is absent. Accept being unimportant.

I think there is something beyond merely accepting it, and that is a kind of relief. Would you not be relieved to know you are the furthest thing from the mind of an IRS auditor? From someone working in parking enforcement? An injured zebra would be happy to know his name has never been circulated in a committee of vultures. But we will have a robust discussion of what the acceptance of unimportance is really about, in the context of this chapter, once every line has been clarified.

This is called “accepting disgrace willingly.” I love the feeling of a punctuation mark left by this line. I say something. I follow it up with a question: do I mean by what I just said? And then I say: it means this. And also that. And then I conclude: that is what is meant by what I said. Lao Tzu may be subtle and nuanced, elusive and even intentionally evasive at times, but he is not wishy-washy and unsure. Everything he says has been duly considered, the object of a great lucubration, and handed down with confidence.

What do you mean by “Accept misfortune as the human condition”?
Misfortune comes from having a body.
Without a body, how could there be misfortune?

To my ear, there is a slight softening here compared to the opening gambit. In the first section we get firm commands: accept being unimportant. Do not be concerned with loss or gain. Now, we get something like a shoulder shrug: misfortune comes from having a body. Without a body, how could there be misfortune? First reprimanding, and now commiserating. From “this is what you must do,” to “what can anyone do?” This is an inversion of the technique he often uses, which is to take something familiar and follow it up with something more demanding or esoteric. The previous chapter was an example of the more common method: linking overstimulation to blindness and deafness, and then inviting us to consider that success and wealth can lead to something analogous to disability in exactly the same way.

It is also worth considering the statement itself: merely existing is the precondition for misfortune. Without a body, how could there be misfortune? I have said before that I simply will not get into a linguistic morass by asking myself where Lao Tzu ends and Gia-Fu Feng begins. I am not a scholar of ancient Chinese, and, more to the point, I want to speak from a position of maximal intellectual charity to Gia-Fu Feng: I assume he is conveying something of the true essence of the text, in the same way that I believe I see and even live in the essence of his translation. The lines of the Tao, as conveyed to me in English by his text, have been a kind of existential harbor to me over many years, and through many storms, the duration and severity of which are beyond the scope of these essays. The exact, idiosyncratic, and obviously inventive rather than literal words of Gia-Fu Feng occasioned a kind of thinking in me that restored my basic moral fitness. It restored my conscience and my reason. Without a body, how could there be misfortune? It is by trying to imagine this, that you “get it.” You stop fantasizing about impossible, utopian outcomes for your life and realize that you are a real thing in a real world and could not possibly be the very first exception to the rules. The rules that cut down the greatest individuals of history and the nameless masses alike: you alone are to be spared, now, because you occupy an entirely unique and extreme stratum of specialness. Misfortune comes from having a body. What is of course implied but not dwelt upon is that if you want to live at all, you have to accept the certainty of dying, but by uncertain means and timing.

Before we get to the closing lines, we should take what is so undeniable about the second stanza and carry it back to the first. Perhaps my expectations of importance are as reasonable as my expectations of bodily immortality. Perhaps my expectations of undisturbed material progress are equally silly and unserious. Again, something not dwelt upon or explicated but nonetheless necessarily implied: it is not said anywhere that I should not find pain painful, but rather that I am not entirely entitled to find the painful conditions frustrating. To be frustrated is to believe that what is happening should not be happening at all, and that it is an unwelcome interruption to What Should Be. When we don’t get our way, when we take a hit financially, or receive a windfall or a breakthrough or some high praise and public recognition for our accomplishments, Lao Tzu says you should not be concerned.

We might dwell on this word “unconcerned” for a moment. It is a common mistake to confuse acceptance with passive resignation. I have to accept that something is happening before I can take action in a timely manner. I have to accept that my efforts or strategy are insufficient or ineffective before I can make the necessary improvements. Acceptance does not mean inaction, but is rather and always the precondition for action. In the same way, being unconcerned cannot mean entirely inattentive. There is an appropriate and even wise response to all gains or losses, and what stands in the way of you giving that response is preoccupation with the self, with how you think you appear to others. This can be easily reasoned through. Suppose you don’t know what to do at all. You at least know that right away. You open a drawer in the desk of the toolshed of your mind and find it empty – what happens then? Do you seek advice? Do you review and study? In the moment it happens, do you know how to handle yourself gracefully and undefensively? There is perhaps no better measure of your sense of self importance than your willingness to seek the instruction of another after an encounter with your own ignorance. Ironically, if you are unwilling to look foolish by admitting you don’t know something, you’ll never embrace the earnest studiousness necessary to become someone whose knowledge might impress someone whose opinion matters to you. And this is really the whole point: excessive preoccupation with one’s standing is a self-defeating position, precisely because it paralyzes you and renders you incapable of taking the necessary actions that might preserve or elevate it. Again, acceptance is a precondition for action, and pretense is always an obstacle to it. To be unconcerned means to simply respond appropriately and practically to whatever comes your way, in any area of your life.

Surrender yourself humbly; then you can be trusted to care for all things.
Love the world as your own self; then you can truly care for all things.

This always stops me in my tracks. On its own the stanza is breathtaking and profound, and worthy of daily repetition and contemplation. Every single chapter of the Tao has some phrase you could spend the rest of your life endeavoring to remember when it mattered most, and this is one of them.

To care for all things: this is the highest achievement a person can attain. Not to rule the world in the sense of being obeyed by the world (good luck to you!), but of being responsible for it. In the sense of the world rightfully falling to you and into your care. All things is of course hyperbole, but it is easy enough to understand how it is meant to scale down to a level that is meaningful to you: all that crosses your path, all that is firmly placed within your purview by life, circumstances, fate, the Tao, whatever you want to say. Here we are, wrestling or bickering or negotiating or factionalizing or commiserating or competing with or much more commonly ignoring the world and people around us, when we could be caring for it.

What it means to care for the world, and the reasons why we should aspire to do so, are rooted in the previous stanzas: accept disgrace willingly. Accept misfortune as the human condition. Accept being unimportant. Do not be concerned with loss or gain. Misfortune comes from having a body. The chapter concludes by totally clarifying why we should come to accept these aspects of life, what we might do with ourselves if we weren’t mired in the feelings of resentment and pettiness brought on by the endless series of transgressions against our sensibilities and interruptions to our designs. Simply, we have to choose between taking ourselves seriously on the one hand and taking the world seriously on the other. Between being respected and showing respect. Are we to be the caretakers or do we need to be cared for? Are we the adults, or are we their children?

Surrender yourself humbly. No, this task is not beneath me. The needs of this person are not beneath me. Wherever I am in life, whatever my station, and whoever seems to need me, to all these I willingly devote my attention, my intelligence, my resources, and my time. Whatever life I thought I ought to have, and to have already had, only the life before me is actually my life. If I do not give myself over to it, I never actually live my life. I never truly live at all. I almost never bring the words of another text into this as an explanatory device, but do you not feel the echoes of he who saves his life will lose it (Matthew 16:25)? Holding out for some alternative and imaginary life, instead of putting all of yourself into this life, right now, is the way most people commit suicide every day.

Love the world as your own self. If you continue to cleave yourself away from the world, true peace and happiness are simply impossible. If you say you love yourself and despise the world, for example, what does that really mean, in practice, on a daily basis? The world is everywhere. Wherever you look, wherever you go, whoever you talk to, there it is, this world you despise. You say you love yourself, but nothing around you inspires loving feelings. You find nothing worthy of love, nothing and no one from whom you would gratefully accept love – how, then, do you ever enjoy the feeling of love? Can you be happy with yourself if you are surrounded on all sides, and at all times, by a world you dislike? A world that is merely an imposition, a disappointment, an obstacle, and, worst of all, a terrible mistake? This is the extremity of course, but it proves the point: there is no self love without love for the world. Love the world as your own self. The presumed necessity of the injunction presupposes that loving yourself is not enough by itself, and may not even be coherent or possible by itself. The person who loves himself or herself first and foremost is the person most concerned with being important, most concerned with losses and gains, most concerned with fortune and misfortune. The endless ups and downs, the endless insults to our pride; when do we think to ourselves, this basic orientation toward the world is not working for me. Maybe I’ve got it all backwards.

Treat the world with the importance you wish to be treated with: I can say it no more straightforwardly than that. Would it also not follow, then, that the person who has such an important world to care for, such important work to do, is also rather important? You become important by doing something important, which can only happen when you take something else more seriously than yourself. The more attention you are willing to give, the more you will have to attend to. You grow in stature, in significance, and, yes, in station and esteem, in direct relationship to the growth of your love and care for the world around you.

Then you can truly care for all things. I should say that this is not exactly altruism in the sense of depleting yourself for the sake of others. I believe what is being said here is closer to the idea that you are not important in and of yourself. You are important if you do something important. If you create and contribute something important. That feeling of wanting to matter, of wanting to be respected and regarded and treated with deference, cannot be demanded outright. It can be earned, however. Ironically, it will only come to the person who has set aside the need for it once and for all. When we hear of great people who were still very insecure and demanding, we feel a kind of pity: we seem to enjoy their success more than they do! How very sad, indeed. When you demand something from the world, no amount will ever be enough. When you set aside the need, or sublimate it into the need to give and attend to rather than the need to receive, even the slightest bit of recognition is felt as a ray of sunshine, a special treat, and an occasion for gratitude. You recognize the goodness in the other person, in that moment of them expressing appreciation, and you enjoy the feeling of admiring their virtues. How much nicer, how much fuller is this, than being the person who measures the crumb that is offered against the loaf that is owed? Accept being unimportant, then you can truly care for all things.

“He Lets Go Of That And Chooses This”

The five colors blind the eye.

The five tones deafen the ear.

The five flavors dull the taste.

Racing and hunting madden the mind

Precious things lead one astray.

Therefore the sage is guided by what he feels and not by what he sees.

He lets go of that and chooses this.

Tao Te Ching, Chapter 12

The first three lines are simple enough. Stimulation easily becomes overstimulation. Overstimulation leads to deterioration. Engagement and consumption lead to burnout. He takes a step toward something less obvious with the next two lines, however: the idea that both pursuing and obtaining what we want can be unhealthy for us.

Before we get to the concluding lines, I think we already have plenty to discuss. 

I think Lao Tzu is caring, not curmudgeonly. I think, and would even say I am convinced, that he wants the best for us. I think his ideas about a good, happy, and fulfilled life are far more elevated than the loftiest aspirations most of us have entertained. I would even go so far as to say that Lao Tzu loves humanity more than most humans love themselves. If I dream of being happy, Lao Tzu dreams of me being happier than that. 

He is warning me not to take the wrong path to get there. Not to seek happiness down the road of “more.” More beautiful music, more delicious food, more opulent possessions and surroundings: no, not that. The five colors blind the eye: you are slowly diminishing your capacity for enjoyment, one enjoyable experience at a time. An experience that begins with a high level of novelty eventually fades into familiarity. The search begins again, but now with less enthusiasm, and, in its place, a growing cynicism: this thing I am seeking will eventually fade, just like the once new but now newly faded thing I have just discarded. As we continue on this way, we only become more aware of this cycle, and it becomes a part of our seeking: we now seek something to discard as much as we seek something to first hold. The expectation of discarding it now walks apace with expectation of enjoyment, like an old widow chaperoning a first date.

I don’t think most people begin to consciously seek out the undesirable attendants of a desirable experience, but we do very often continue to chase the things we want knowing full well that they come with plenty of what nobody could possibly want. Hangovers. Indigestion. A loss of vigor and vitality in the mind and body alike. Wasting away on the one hand and ballooning out on the other. A mind dull and indolent upon waking. A body that considers movement and activity a chore. And, most of all: the anticipation of the next experience eclipsing this experience. When you have spent your dinner craving dessert, either literally or metaphorically, the five flavors have dulled the taste.

You might say I am describing the behavior of an addict, and that you are not an addict.

Something Lao Tzu and I have in common, if I may be so generous to myself: we believe that hyperbole makes the point beautifully. The same way he doesn’t really mean you will go blind from seeing beautiful things or deaf from enjoying music (although hearing damage is much easier to inflict now than when he composed the Tao), I don’t mean to say that we all behave like addicts all the time, or that we are not meaningfully distinct from addicts in our daily consumptive behaviors. It is playful hyperbole, not a failure to recognize gradations. And, this is another principle you will see over and over again in the Tao, and have by now already seen: take the tiny thing and magnify it, as a strategy for recognizing something in it and promptly taking action. Moderate language makes the case for complacency, for acceptance. Hyperbolic language justifies immediate and decisive action. 

I should point out that this is certainly a sword that cuts both ways: use it with nothing but the utmost of caution. 

When you think to light up a cigarette, imagine a blackened corpse pulled from smoldering ruins. When you look at the cream-filled donut, imagine yourself morbidly obese and confined to a wheelchair. When you find yourself flirting with someone who you realize is a bit lonely, imagine the abrupt and irrevocable end of your relationship, and on the worst of possible terms.

Not just with things we know are a bad idea, but with laudable goals as well. When you think of making partner at a law firm, imagine 80 hour work weeks, your children waiting for you to come home and giving up, going to bed neglected. Imagine your wife looking elsewhere to fulfill her needs. In other words, imagine an outcome where the achievement of the goal is not worth the price. Not in the words of someone else, but in terms you find entirely convincing. This is the exercise we are invited to perform when we read the simplest of lines: precious things lead one astray. 

Racing and hunting madden the mind. Have you ever felt like something was only moving farther away the longer you pursued it? That you were beginning to forget why you were seeking it, and what you meant to do once you acquired or achieved it? This is what losing yourself feels like, and it disguises itself by projecting itself onto the world: you think the problem is with other people and circumstances. If you are responding to each setback, delay, or obstacle by applying more force, you are living in the experience this line warns you about. 

One might summarize the negative outcome the Tao Te Ching is helping you avoid as the following equation: positive feedback loops plus the phase of negative returns equals a hell of your own making. This idea, and its inverse, which we will discuss often and at length, inform almost every single line of the entire text. It is simply much easier to go too far than you probably think. Going too far happens slowly at first. When it picks up speed, that goes almost unnoticed. You condition yourself to something, and you stop checking yourself as you respond to circumstances. You are already lost, already confused, already telling lies to yourself as you only continue the pursuit. 

Vision turns to blindness. Hearing turns to deafness. The enjoyment of food ends in tastelessness. Going after what you want leaves you estranged from yourself, your relationships, and even your sanity.

What does Lao Tzu offer as an alternative? 

Therefore the sage is guided by what he feels and not by what he sees. 

He lets go of that and chooses this.

We have slowly become very confused about what our emotions are and what they are for. This is a cost incurred by creating a more rational world, governed by processes and technologies enabled by logical, scientific, and mathematical forms of thinking. That which cannot be measured seems to have no place in public life. Everything is about metrics, performance, analysis, and so on. It’s my world, and I’m sure it’s yours, too. So what are we to make of this statement, that the wise man is guided by what he feels and not by what he sees? One word makes sense of it for us: therefore. Because of the precise way in which negative outcomes occur and become the norm, become life outcomes, and even fate itself, the sage lives his life in the opposite way. There is a recipe for failure, and the sage inverts it. That doesn’t work, therefore I do this. What doesn’t work, in the words of this chapter, is the unrelenting pursuit of sensory stimulation and the ding ding ding of scoring points in whatever arena you find yourself. That is what leads you astray, wears you down, and ultimately never satisfies you. It never delivers you to the promised land of peace, wisdom, and happiness. It never turns you into the sage. 

What does work, therefore, is to be guided by what you feel. To navigate the world, rather than react to it, by the guidance of your feelings. It should be said right away that this includes negative emotions just as much as positive emotions. Being guided by what you feel is to ask yourself why you are angry. Why the situation on the outside of you was met with an anger on the inside of you. To be guided by what you see is to unquestioningly accept the proposition this is making me angry. A sage sees the same situation in a way closer to this: a moment, a person, some information knocked on the door of my self, and it was an angry me that opened it. Why? Why was it that understanding, patience, care, or curiosity did not come to the door? Perhaps it was unnecessary to come to the door at all. This is what it might look like to be guided by what you feel instead of what you see, to let go of that, which is the reaction-eliciting object, and choose this, the life-navigating hierarchy of values always operating within yourself in the form of emotions. 

Nobody is saying emotions are to be obeyed. It does not say the sage is controlled by what he feels, or that he does whatever he feels like doing. He is guided by them. He sees them as information. To slow down and bring yourself to order, to attend to your own needs and your own household, and address the feelings of frustration or agitation within yourself, and then go meet the world, the thing you see: this is the way. Letting go of that and choosing this is a process of rejecting superficial explanations and a reactionary way of living in order to find things within your control, and to then take control of them. That is outside you. You don’t own it. This is within you. It’s yours. That is something you have to go and get, while this is something you already have.

To chase after things your whole life is sad and lonely. A sage is someone who, at some point, learns how to have things. How to have relationships, a family, a household, and a place in the world. A sage knows how to maintain and properly, expertly put to use what he already has. He is someone who understands stewardship and steadfastness. The outwardly-directed drives of youth have mellowed into paternal care: I  have built a life, and now I must watch over it. I have expended the energy and other resources necessary to acquire it, and now I must maintain it, appreciate it, and enjoy it.

This ability to have, to choose this after letting go of that, is something that shows up absolutely everywhere in a person’s life. People seek employment, but do they know how to be employees? They seek relationships, but do they fall in love with what it means to be a husband or wife? They want children, but do they want to become parents? They want money and financial security, but do they know how to be stable and enjoy themselves once they have enough? Hunger drives a person to eat, and eating relieves the hunger, but do you truly know how to simply enjoy the feeling of being well fed? Of being satisfied? Or does the presence or awareness of more compel you to continue seeking? 

The sage chooses this. The feeling of hunger or the feeling of fullness. Pursue when there is a need to be fulfilled, a need that is felt on the inside. But when the feeling is one of fullness, of satiety, of having something to contend with, the pursuit must end so the care and stewardship can begin. This has nothing to do with asceticism, or moralizing against the world, or devaluing what we have acquired and writing it off as “just stuff.” Rather, it has everything to do with the ability to fulfill the purpose for which we acquire something. The sage lives in a way that dignifies and endows with meaning and utility all that he has, all that he touches. A sage eats a meal because it benefits the body. A fool is someone who eats just because the food looks appetizing. The good news is that the sage doesn’t have any special knowledge that you don’t. You can be sagely today, right now, by simply paying more attention to what you have than what you don’t, by noticing what it feels like to focus on this instead of that.